Avaliação da cidadania ativa Definição da estrutura conceitual

Main Article Content

Ekaterina Enchikova
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3919-2447
Tiago Neves
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4309-5906
Pedro Ferreira

Abstract

Cidadania Ativa (CA) é uma noção complexa e multidimensional que engloba construtos relacionados, como engajamento cívico e político, competência cívica, identidade dos cidadãos, valores democráticos, entre outros. No entanto, diferentes estudos oferecem diferentes modelos de CA, enfocando aspetos específicos da mesma. Neste artigo, enfocamos os instrumentos de pesquisa utilizados nos grandes estudos internacionais de CA, pois refletem como os construtos são compreendidos e interpretados por diferentes autores. Este artigo revisa as estruturas e as pesquisas de sete estudos de CA para elaborar uma estrutura conceitual abrangente que incorpora diferentes dimensões, sinaliza os domínios principais e define as relações entre eles. Este artigo elucida as visões atuais sobre a operacionalização da CA e pode ser usado não apenas para desenvolver instrumentos para avaliação futura da CA, mas também para fornecer um contexto para melhor compreensão e interpretação dos estudos atuais.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Enchikova, E. ., Neves, T., & Ferreira, P. (2021). Avaliação da cidadania ativa: Definição da estrutura conceitual. Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, 60. https://doi.org/10.24840/esc.vi60.360
Section
ARTICLES | Open call
Author Biographies

Tiago Neves, CIIE – Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Educativas, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

Professor Associado na Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto (FPCEUP) e membro integrado do Cetro de Investigação e Intervenção Educativas (CIIE).

Pedro Ferreira, CIIE – Centro de Investigação e Intervenção Educativas, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

Professor Auxiliar na Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto (FPCEUP) e membro integrado do Cetro de Investigação e Intervenção Educativas (CIIE).

How to Cite

Enchikova, E. ., Neves, T., & Ferreira, P. (2021). Avaliação da cidadania ativa: Definição da estrutura conceitual. Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, 60. https://doi.org/10.24840/esc.vi60.360

References

Abs, Hermann, & Veldhuis, Ruud (2006). Indicators on active citizenship for democracy: The social, cultural and economic domain. Paper by order of the Council of Europe for the CRELL-Network on Active Citizenship for Democracy. https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2009/1879/pdf/CoE_Abs_Veldhuis_2006_D_A.pdf

Antonini, Matteo, Hogg, Michael, Mannetti, Lucia, Barbieri, Barbara, & Wagoner, Joseph (2015). Motivating citizens to participate in public policymaking: Identification, trust and cost-benefit analyses. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(2), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.408

Barnes, Rebecca, Auburn, Timothy, & Lea, Susan (2004). Citizenship in practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(2), 187-206. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666041501705

Barrett, Martyn, & Zani, Bruna (2015). Political and civic engagement: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Routledge.

Barrett, Martyn (2012). The PIDOP project: An overview. Project Report. School of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK. http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/id/eprint/775796

Barrett, Martyn, & Brunton-Smith, Ian (2014). Political and civic engagement and participation: Towards an integrative perspective. Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2013.871911

Benn, Roseanne (2010). The genesis of active citizenship in the learning society. Studies in the Education of Adults, 32(2), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2000.11661433

Cammaerts, Bart, Bruter, Michael, Banaji, Shakuntala, Harrison, Sarah, & Anstead, Nick (2013). EACEA 2010/03: Youth participation in democratic life, final report. London School of Economics. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/69761/

De Weerd, Marga, Gemmeke, Mireille, Rigter, Josine, & Van Rij, Coen (2005). Indicators for monitoring active citizenship and citizenship education. Final Report. Regioplan Beleidsonderzoek.

Doğanay, Ahmet (2012). A curriculum framework for active democratic citizenship education. In Murray Print & Dirk Lange (Eds.), Schools, curriculum and civic education for building democratic citizens (pp. 19-39). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-167-2_3

Edwards, Michael (2009). Civil society (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

Ekman, Joakim, & Amnå, Erik (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 283-300. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1

European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice (2017). Citizenship education at school in Europe – 2017. Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union.

Haste, Helen (2004). Constructing the citizen. Political Psychology, 25(3), 413-439. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3792550

Hoskins, Bryony, & Mascherini, Massimiliano (2009). Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 459-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9271-2

Hoskins, Bryony, Saisana, Michaela, & Villalba, Cynthia (2015). Civic competence of youth in Europe: Measuring cross national variation through the creation of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 123(2), 431-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0746-z

Keating, Avril (2014). Education for citizenship in Europe: European policies, national adaptations and young people's attitudes. Springer.

Kennedy, Kerry (2007). Student constructions of “active citizenship”: What does participation mean to students?. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(3), 304-324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00381.x

Kovalchuk, Vitaliy, Sofinska, Iryna, & Bohiv, Yaryna (2019). Citizenship and sovereignty as democratic values of a state in global world. European Cooperation, 9(40), 7-17. http://www.we.clmconsulting.pl/index.php/we/article/view/432

Lister, Ruth (2003). What is citizenship? In Jo Campling (Eds.), Citizenship: Feminist perspectives (pp. 13-42). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80253-7_2

Mccarthy, James (2019). Authoritarianism, populism, and the environment: Comparative experiences, insights, and perspectives. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(2), 301-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1554393

McDermott, Rose (2019). Psychological underpinnings of post-truth in political beliefs. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(2), 218-222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651800207X

Menezes, Isabel (2003). Participation experiences and civic concepts, attitudes and engagement: implications for citizenship education projects. European Educational Research Journal, 2(3), 430-445. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2003.2.3.8

Parry, Geraint, Moyser, George, & Day, Neil (1992). Political participation and democracy in Britain. Cambridge University Press.

Powell, Martin (2002). The hidden history of social citizenship. Citizenship Studies, 6(3), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362102022000011595

Ranson, Stewart (1988). From 1944 to 1988: Education, citizenship and democracy. Local Government Studies, 14(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003938808433382

Ribeiro, Norberto, Neves, Tiago, & Menezes, Isabel (2017). An organization of the theoretical perspectives in the field of civic and political participation: Contributions to citizenship education. Journal of Political Science Education, 13(4), 426-446. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2017.1354765

Scholz, Evi, Jutz, Regina, Pammett, Jon, & Hadler, Markus (2017). ISSP and the ISSP 2014 Citizenship II Module: An introduction. International Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2017.1264825

Schulz, Wolfram, Ainley, John, Fraillon, Julian, Losito, Bruno, & Agrusti, Gabriella (2016). IEA International civic and citizenship education study 2016 assessment framework. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39357-5

Stevenson, Clifford, Hopkins, Nick, Luyt, Russel, & Dixon, John (2015). The social psychology of citizenship: Engagement with citizenship studies and future research. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(2), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i2.581

Ten Dam, Geert, Geijsel, Femke, Reumerman, Rene, & Ledoux, Guuske (2011). Measuring young people’s citizenship competences. European Journal of Education, 46(3), 354-372. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.360199

Thomassen, Jacques (2011). European social survey core questionnaire development – Chapter 5: Opinions about political issues. European Social Survey, City University London.

Torney-Purta, Judith, Cabrera, Julio C., Roohr, Katrina C., Liu, Ou L., & Rios, Joseph A. (2015). Assessing civic competency and engagement in higher education: Research background, frameworks, and directions for next-generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2015(2), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12081

Turner, Bryan S. (1990). Outline of a theory of citizenship. Sociology, 24(2), 189-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038590024002002

Zukin, Cliff (Ed.). (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford University Press.