For architects, mere spatial visualization has ceased to suffice. They are now mandated to formulate fresh narratives pertaining to pioneering modes of engagement within novel sociocultural contexts. In turn, Architectural education, responsible for training the future builders of the world, plays a significant role in response to these demands and in creating a more sustainable, equitable, and fair built environment. However, mismatches between existing educational structures and evolving needs signal the necessity for reevaluating teaching practices.
In the 1960s and 1970s, the proximity between the concepts radical and utopia to Architectural education led to pioneering pedagogical experiments, representing a significant innovation in the field. The importance of their revival has found resonance in recent theories, sowing the seeds of future pedagogical ecologies at a time when the future of pedagogical radicalism faces new challenges. Thus, and at a time when Architectural education faces a significant crisis, this article strives to (re)unite the concepts of radical and utopia, which have drifted apart from the academic realm, underscoring the necessity of their rooting in Architectural training and practice by understanding and validating their potential.
When delving into the topic of radical pedagogies in Architectural education, by superficially analysing the process behind their construction, a cohesive framework of criteria that underpin these initiatives can be inferred: their critical, revolutionary, reformist, and transgressive nature as well as the nearly symbiotic presence — varying in degrees of intensity and with rare exceptions — of utopia at their core. In this context, the present study reveals the definition of a qualitative “Utopian Lens" towards the production of a taxonomy, built from a comprehensive review of published case studies.
This reflection, with a specific focus on eagle-eye the presence of utopia at their core, highlights fundamental elements within the structure of these approaches, allowing a categorized reading of the corpus of analysis, showcasing recuring patterns within the scope of the ongoing research. This process provided a collection that shows that utopia can be conveyed through radical pedagogies as a (1) Drive, across various types of (2) Thought, taking on multiple (3) Forms while embracing a wide array of diverse yet complementary (4) Principles.
Cover page: Creation of models for project presentation to the community. (Source: Collage by the Author)
Referencias
Abdulla, Danah. “Radicalise Me.” In Modes of Criticism 4. Radical Pedagogy, edited by Francisco Laranjo, 1st ed., 5–11. Porto: Onomatopee, 2019.
Araújo, Rogério Bianchi. “Os Estudos Sobre a Utopia Como Referência Para Os Estudos Sobre a Sociedade.” In Pensar o Futuro, Preparar a Mudança. Livro de Atas Do 1.o Encontro de Prospetiva., 175–94. Évora: CICS. NOVA. UÉVORA, 2017.
Aydemir, Ayse Zeynep. “Experiments, Practices and Positions in Architectural Design Studio.” PhD, Istanbul Technical University, 2017.
Bandeira, Pedro, and Nuno Faria. Escola Do Porto : Lado B. 1968-1978 (Uma História Oral). Edited by Nuno Faria. 1st ed. Porto: A Oficina, CIPRL & Sistema Solar (Documenta), 2014.
Bloch, Ernst. The Principle of Hope, 3 Vols. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1986.
Butt, Amy. “On Concrete Utopias.” In Concrete Utopias: An Education of Desire, edited by Nathaniel Coleman and Amy Butt, 1:2–9. The Lerverhulm Trust, 2017. https://issuu.com/amybutt/docs/concreteutopias.
Coleman, Nathaniel. “Cities and Buildings: Educating Utopia.” In Concrete Utopias: An Education of Desire, edited by Nathaniel Coleman and Amy Butt, 1:10–12. The Lerverhulm Trust, 2017. https://issuu.com/amybutt/docs/concreteutopias.
———. “Modern Architecture and the Peculiar Adventure of Utopia.” In Concrete Utopias: An Education of Desire, edited by Nathaniel Coleman and Amy Butt, 1:104–15. The Lerverhulm Trust, 2017. https://issuu.com/amybutt/docs/concreteutopias.
———. “Project Brief: Rhytmanalysis of Concrete Utopias.” In Concrete Utopias: An Education of Desire, edited by Nathaniel Coleman and Amy Butt, 1:84–87. The Lerverhulm Trust, 2017. https://issuu.com/amybutt/docs/concreteutopias.
———. Utopias and Architecture. 1st ed. London: Routledge, 2005.
Colomina, Beatriz, Ignacio González Galán, Evangelos Kotsioris, and Anna-Maria Meister. Radical Pedagogies. Edited by Beatriz Colomina, Ignacio González Galán, Evangelos Kotsioris, and Anna-Maria Meister. MIT Press, 2022.
Coté, Mark, Richard Day, and Greig de Peuter. “Utopian Pedagogy: Creating Radical Alternatives in the Neoliberal Age 1.” Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 29, no. 4 (2007): 317–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714410701291129.
Doucet, Isabelle. “Learning in the ‘Real’ World: Encounters with Radical Architectures (1960s–1970s).” Journal of Educational Administration and History 49, no. 1 (2017): 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2017.1252735.
Fedotova, Olga, and Elena Nikolaeva. “Radical Pedagogy: Theoretical Concept and/or Alternative Practice?” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186 (2015): 785–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.010.
Frank, Scott. The Queen’s Gambit (Episode 7). United States: Netflix, 2020.
Hammond, Craig A. Hope, Utopia and Creativity in Higher Education. Pedagogical Tactics for Alternative Futures. Education Review. 1st ed. Vol. 26. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
Harriss, Harriet, and Daisy Froud. Radical Pedagogies : Architectural Education And The British Tradition. Edited by Harriet Harriss and Daisy Froud. 1st ed. Newcastle: RIBA Publishing, 2015.
Harvey, David. Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000.
Ingels, Bjarke. BIG. Yes Is More: An Archicomic on Architectural Evolution. TASCHEN GmbH, 2009. Edited by Taschen, 2009.
Lefebvre, Henri. Le Droit à La Ville. Edited by Anthropos. Paris, 1968.
Levitas, Ruth. Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Morin, Edgar. Introdução Ao Pensamento Complexo. Edited by Luís Gomes. 5th ed. Editora Sulina, 2005.
Moylan, Tom. Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian Imagination. Methuen, 1986.
Storey, John. Radical Utopianism and Cultural Studies : On Refusing to Be Realistic. 1st ed. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2019.: Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315201580.
Torisson, Frederik. “Utopology. A Re-Interrogation of the Utopian in Architecture.” PhD, Lund University, 2017.
Vieira, Fátima. “The Concept of Utopia.” In The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature, edited by Gregory Claeys, 3–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521886659.001.
———. “The Four Modes of Thinking Framed by Utopian Discursivity. Or Why We Need Utopia.” In Utopias: Worlds and Frontiers of the Imaginary, 27–33. London: CRC Press, 2016.
———. “Utopias Realistas Para a Construção Social Europeia.” In Utopias Europeias: O Poder Da Imaginação e Os Imperativos Do Futuro, 41–53. Porto: Serralves, 2021.
Waterman, Tim. “Making Meaning: Utopian Method for Minds, Bodies, and Media in Architectural Design.” Open Library of Humanities 4, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.109.
Webb, Darren.“Where’s the Vision? The Concept of Utopia in Contemporary Educational Theory.” Oxford Review of Education 35, no. 6 (December 2009): 743–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980903371179.
Xavier, Sérgio. “Radical Education: A Pathway for New Utopias and Reimagining European Democracies.” In Youth Partnership, 20, 2022.
Yurtkuran, Selay, Gözde Kırlı, and Yavuz Taneli. “An Innovative Approach in Architectural Education: Designing a Utopia.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 89 (2013): 821–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.939.
