Centros de ciencia y su contribución al compromiso discursivo: un estudio de caso en el SESI Lab
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
En este estudio cualitativo analizamos las conversaciones de tres grupos de visitantes adultos durante su interacción con el aparato Torneo del Futuro, perteneciente a la colección del SESI Lab, en Brasilia. Nuestro objetivo fue comprender cómo la actividad involucra a los visitantes en conversaciones y reflexiones sobre temas relacionados con la ciencia, la tecnología, la sociedad y el medio ambiente. Los datos se recopilaron mediante grabaciones en video realizadas con cámaras GoPro, posteriormente transcritas y sometidas a un análisis de contenido inductivo, con categorías emergentes derivadas del material empírico.
Los resultados indican que la participación discursiva se caracterizó predominantemente por intervenciones breves, en su mayoría afirmaciones directas acompañadas de justificaciones simples. Sin embargo, también surgieron momentos de colaboración social, cuando los participantes negociaron o apoyaron mutuamente sus decisiones, así como momentos de reflexividad crítica, cuando cuestionaron la lógica del juego o consideraron las implicaciones éticas y sociales de sus elecciones.
Concluimos que, aunque limitado por una dinámica binaria de decisiones rápidas, el aparato funcionó como un detonante de interacciones sociales y reflexiones, configurándose como un objeto social que amplía el potencial de los museos y centros de ciencia como espacios de diálogo y deliberación pública.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.displayStats.downloads##
Detalles del artículo
Número
Sección
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Os/as autores/as mantêm os direitos autorais, sem restrições, e concedem à revista ESC o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-CompartilhaIgual 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-SA). É permitido copiar, transformar e distribuir e adaptar o material em qualquer suporte ou formato, desde que com o devido reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista, as alterações sejam identificadas e seja aplicada a mesma licença ao material derivado, não podendo ser usado para fins comerciais.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Bandelli, Andrea, & Konjin, Elly A. (2012). Science centers and public participation: Methods, strategies, and barriers. Science Communication, 35(4), 419–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547012458910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012458910
Brady, Henry E., Verba, Sidney, & Schlozman, Kay L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2082425
Burris, Alexandra (2017). A child’s-eye view: An examination of point-of-view camera use in four informal education settings. Visitor Studies, 20(2), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2017.1404352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2017.1404352
Cameron, Fiona (2005). Contentiousness and shifting knowledge paradigms: The roles of history and science museums in contemporary societies. Museum Management and Curatorship, 20(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770500502003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770500502003
Charmaz, Kathy (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
Colombo Junior, Pedro D., & Marandino, Martha (2020). Museus de ciências e controvérsias sociocientíficas: Reflexões necessárias. JCOMAL, 3(01), A02. https://doi.org/10.22323/3.03010202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22323/3.03010202
Creswell, John W. (2010). Projeto de pesquisa: Métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto (3.ª ed.). Artmed.
Falk, John H., Dierking, Lynn D., & Foutz, Susan (2007). In principal, in practice: Museum as learning institutions. Altamira Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9780759113794
Glăveanu, Vlad P., & Lahlou, Saadi (2012). Through the creator’s eyes: Using the subjective camera to study craft creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2-3), 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677293
Gutwill, Josh (2007). Preliminary tracking and timing results from SMM workshop. Exploratorium.
Haywood, Naomi, & Cairns, Paul (2006). Engagement with an interactive museum exhibit. In Tom McEwan, Jan Gulliksen, & David Benyon (Eds.), People and computers XIX: The bigger picture (pp. 113–129). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-249-7_8
Heath, Christian, & vom Lehn, Dirk (2008). Configuring “interactivity”: Enhancing engagement in science centres and museums. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707084152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707084152
Hein, George (1998). Learning in the museum. Routledge.
Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean (1994). Museum communication: An introductory essay. In Eilean Hooper-Greenhill (Ed.), The educational role of the museum (pp. 9–17). Routledge.
Kersting, Magdalena, Steier, Rolf, & Venville, Grady (2021). Exploring participant engagement during an astrophysics virtual reality experience at a science festival. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 11(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1857458 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1857458
Lakatos, Eva M., & Marconi, Marina A. (2007). Metodologia científica: Ciência e conhecimento científico, métodos científicos, teoria, hipóteses e variáveis, metodologia jurídica (5.ª ed.). Atlas.
Lima, Guilherme, & Rocha, Jéssica N. (2021). Interações discursivas entre educadores museais e estudantes: Um estudo de caso em um museu de ciências a partir das contribuições de Bakhtin e do círculo. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 21(2021), e21788. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2021u3163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2021u3163
Massarani, Luisa, Fazio, María Eugenia, Rocha, Jessica N., Dávila, Analía, Espinosa, Susana, & Bognanni, Fabián A. (2019). La interactividad en los museos de ciencias, pivote entre expectativas y hechos empíricos: El caso del Centro Interactivo de Ciencia y Tecnología Abremate (Argentina). Ciência & Educação, 25(2), 467–484. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320190020012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320190020012
Massarani, Luisa, Reznik, Gabriela, Rocha, Jessica N., Falla, Sigrid, Rowe, Shawn, Martins, Alanna D., & Amorim, Luis Henrique (2019). A experiência de adolescentes ao visitar um museu de ciência: Um estudo no museu da vida. Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 21, e10524. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172019210115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172019210115
Massarani, Luisa, Scalfi, Graziele, Rocha, Jessica N., Luz, Rafael, & Marandino, Martha (2021). A experiência interativa de famílias em um museu de ciências: Um estudo no Museu de Ciência e Tecnologia de Porto Alegre. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 26(1), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2021v26n1p261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2021v26n1p261
McCallie, Ellen, Bell, Larry, Lohwater, Tiffany, Falk, John H., Lehr, Jane L., Lewenstein, Bruce V., Needham, Cynthia, & Wiehe, Ben (2009). Many experts, many audiences: Public engagement with science and informal science education. A CAISE inquiry group report. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE). http://caise.insci.org/uploads/docs/public_engagement_with_science.pdf
McCallie, Ellen, Simonsson, Elin, Gammon, Ben, Nilsson, Katrina, Lehr, Jane, & Davies, Sarah (2007). Learning to generate dialogue: Theory, practice, and evaluation. Museums & Social Issues, 2(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1179/msi.2007.2.2.165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/msi.2007.2.2.165
National Academy of Engineering Committee on Technological Literacy. (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. The National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. National Academies Press.
Novak, Magdalena, Gramser, Siëlle, Köster, Sandra, Ceseña, Feliza, Gerber-Hirt, Sabine, Schwan, Stephan, & Lewalter, Doris (2024). Presenting a socio-scientific issue in a science and technology museum: Effects on interest, knowledge and argument repertoire. Science Education, 108, 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21830
Oliveira, Bianca H. (2020). Participação social em museus de ciências: Um diálogo em construção [Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade de São Paulo]. USP - Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações. https://doi.org/10.11606/D.81.2020.tde-17062020-165124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/D.81.2020.tde-17062020-165124
Reich, Christine, Bell, Larry, Kollman, Elizabeth, & Chin, Elissa (2007). Fostering civic dialogue: A new role for science museums? Museums & Social Issues, 2(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1179/msi.2007.2.2.207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/msi.2007.2.2.207
Rowe, Shawn (2018). Are families talking about conservation at live animal exhibits? Analyzing family and professional conservation discourse [Doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University]. ScholarsArchive@OSU. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/4q77fx046
Rowe, Shawn, & Kisiel, James (2012). Family engagement at aquarium touch tanks: Exploring interactions and the potential for learning. In Eva Davidsson & Anders Jakobsson (Eds.) Understanding interactions at science centers and museums (pp. 63–77). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-725-7_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-725-7_5
Schwan, Stephan, Grajal, Alejandro, & Lewalter, Doris (2014). Understanding and engagement in places of science experience: Science museums, science centers, zoos, and aquariums. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.917588 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.917588
SESI Lab. (2025). Pesquisa Timing & Tracking: Conduzida por escuta projetos educacionais [Relatório interno não publicado].
Shaby, Neta, Assaraf, Orit B.-Z., & Tal, Tali (2019). Engagement in a science museum: The role of social interactions. Visitor Studies, 22(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2019.1591855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2019.1591855
Shrapnel, Emma (2012). Engaging young adults in museums: An audience research study. Australian Museum. https://media.australian.museum/media/dd/Uploads/Documents/26111/Final+Project.e3d7707.pdf
Simon, Nina (2010). The participatory museum. Museum 2.0.
Westheimer, Joel, & Kahne, Joseph (2004a). Educating the “good” citizen: Political choices and pedagogical goals. PS: Political Science and Politics, 37(2), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504004160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504004160
Westheimer, Joel, & Kahne, Joseph (2004b). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002237
Wynne, Brian (1995). Public understanding of science. In Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen & Trevor Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 361–388). SAGE.
Yin, Robert K. (2005). Estudo de caso: Planejamento e métodos (3.ª ed.). Bookman.