PhD candidates’ engagement in researcher networks and the key learning experiences embedded in them
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Researcher networks are highly important for a positive PhD experience and the future career of PhD candidates in and beyond academia. Our study explores PhD candidates’ engagement in researcher networks, ranging from the local to the global sphere, the key learning experiences embedded in them, and how such engagement is associated with their doctoral thesis format, research group status, and the candidate’s country of origin. A total of 768 PhD candidates from a research-intensive multidisciplinary Finnish university participated. The data were collected through a doctoral experience survey. The results showed that PhD candidates participate widely in research collaboration activities, especially by presenting at conferences and participating in international summer schools. Most learning experiences were located in local networks. Some differences between the candidates were found related to the thesis format, research group status, and candidates’ country of origin. Our study provides a new understanding of PhD candidates’ researcher networks, and the results can be used in the development of support systems in doctoral education to enhance PhD candidates’ research collaboration locally and globally.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright, without restrictions, in their articles and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike Licence 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA). Readers are free to copy, display, distribute, and adapt an article, as long as the work is attributed to the author(s) and ESC, the changes are identified, and the same license applies to the derivative work. Only non-commercial uses of the work are permitted.
How to Cite
References
Adrian-Taylor, Shelly R., Noels, Kimberly A., & Tischler, Kurt (2007). Conflict between international graduate students and faculty supervisors: Toward effective conflict prevention and management strategies. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(1), 90–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306286313
Anttila, Henrika, Pyhältö, Kirsi, & Tikkanen, Lotta (2023). Doctoral supervisors’ and supervisees’ perceptions on supervisory support and frequency of supervision: Do they match? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 288–302. Ehttps://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2238673
Anttila, Henrika, Sullanmaa, Jenni, & Pyhältö, Kirsi (2021). Does it feel the same? Danish and Finnish social science and humanities doctoral students’ academic emotions. Frontiers in education, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.758179
Bienkowska, Dzamila, & Klofsten, Magnus (2012). Creating entrepreneurial networks: Academic entrepreneurship, mobility and collaboration during PhD education. Higher Education, 64, 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9488-x
Blackford, Sarah (2018). Harnessing the power of communities: Career networking strategies for bioscience PhD students and postdoctoral researchers. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(8). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny033
Brechelmacher, Angelika, Park, Elke, Ates, Gülay, & Campbell, David F. (2015). The rocky road to tenure: Career paths in academia. In Tatiana Fumasoli, Gaële Goastellec, & Barbara M. Kehm (Eds.), Academic work and careers in Europe: Trends, challenges, perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10720-2_2
Cai, Liexu, Dangeni, Dangeni, Elliot, Dely L., He, Rui, Liu, Jianshu, Makara, Kara A., Pacheco, Emily-Marie, Shih, Kim, Wang, Wenting, & Zhang, Jie (2019). A conceptual enquiry into communities of practice as praxis in international doctoral education. Journal of Praxis in Higher Education, 1(1), 11–36. https://doi.org/10.47989/kpdc74
Castelló, Montressat, Pardo, Marta, Sala-Bubaré, Anna, & Suñe-Soler, Núria (2017). Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors. Higher Education, 74, 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9
Chamberlain, Geoffrey P. (2006). Researching strategy formation process: An abductive methodology. Quality and Quantity, 40, 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-8094-3
Corcelles-Seuba, Marlona, Suñe-Soler, Núria, Sala-Bubaré, Anna, & Castelló, Montserrat (2023). Doctoral student perceptions of supervisory and research community support: Their relationships with doctoral conditions and experiences. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2142102
Cornér, Solveig, Pyhältö, Kirsi, Peltonen, Jouni, & Bengtsen, Søren E. (2018). Similar or different? Researcher community and supervisory support experiences among Danish and Finnish social sciences and humanities PhD students. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 9(2), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00003
Creswell, John W., & Plano Clark, Vicki L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Douglas, Alaster S. (2023). Engaging doctoral students in networking opportunities: A relational approach to doctoral study. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1808611
Drisko, James W., & Maschi, Tina (2015). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
Dysthe, Olga, Samara, Akylina, & Westrheim, Kariane (2006). Multivoiced supervision of master’s students: A case study of alternative supervision practices in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680562
Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf
Germain-Alamartine, Eloise, Ahoba-Sam, Rhoda, Moghadam-Saman, Saeed, & Evers, Gerwin (2021). Doctoral graduates’ transition to industry: Networks as a mechanism? Cases from Norway, Sweden and the UK. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2680–2695. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1754783
Germain-Alamartine, Eloise, & Moghadam-Saman, Saeed (2019). Aligning doctoral education with local industrial employers’ needs: A comparative case study. European Planning Studies, 28(2), 234–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1637401
Gruber, Marie, Crispeels, Thomas, & D’Este, Pablo (2023). Who am I? The influence of knowledge networks on PhD students’ formation of a researcher role identity. Minerva, 61, 521–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09492-1
Gureyev, Vadim N., Mazov, Nikolay A., Kosyakov, Denis V., & Guskov, Andrey E. (2020). Review and analysis of publications on scientific mobility: Assessment of influence, motivation, and trends. Scientometrics, 124, 1599–1630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03515-4
Hall, Kara L., Vogel, Amanda L., Huang, Grace C., Serrano, Katrina J., Rice, Elise L., Tsakraklides, Sophia P., & Fiore, Stephen M. (2018). The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American Psychology, 73(4), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000319
Horta, Hugo, Birolini, Sebastian, Cattaneo, Mattia, Shen, Wenqin, & Paleari, Stefano (2021). Research network propagation: The impact of PhD students’ temporary international mobility. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00096
Hutchings, Maggie (2017). Improving doctoral support through group supervision: Analysing face-to-face and technology-mediated strategies for nurturing and sustaining scholarship. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1058352
Iglič, Hajdeja, Doreian, Patrick, Kronegger, Luka, & Ferligoj, Anuška (2017). With whom do researchers collaborate and why? Scientometrics, 112, 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2386-y
Jackson, Denise, & Michelson, Grant (2015). Factors influencing the employment of Australian PhD graduates. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1660–1678. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.899344
Janta, Hania, Lugosi, Peter, & Brown, Lorraine (2014). Coping with loneliness: An ethnographic study of doctoral students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 38(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2012.726972
Jiang, Jin, & Shen, Wenqin (2019). International mentorship and research collaboration: Evidence from European-trained Chinese PhD returnees. Frontiers of Education in China, 14, 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-019-0010-z
Jones, Michael (2013). Issues in Doctoral studies: Forty years of journal discussion: Where have we been and where are we going? International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8(6), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.28945/1871
Kyvik, Svein, & Reymert, Ingvild (2017). Research collaboration in groups and networks: Differences across academic fields. Scientometrics, 113, 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2497-5
Laufer, Melissa, & Gorup, Meta (2019). The invisible others: Stories of international doctoral student dropout. Higher Education, 78, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0337-z
Le, Tam, & Gardner, Susan K. (2010). Understanding the doctoral experience of Asian international students in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields: An exploration of one institutional context. Journal of College Student Development, 51(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0127
Lee, Anna (2008). How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Studies in Higher education, 33(3), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202
Leydesdorff, Loet, & Wagner, Caroline S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.003
Mantai, Lilia (2019). ‘A source of sanity’: The role of social support for doctoral candidates’ belonging and becoming. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 367–382. https://doi.org/10.28945/4275
McAlpine, Lynn, & Amundsen, Cheryl (2012). Challenging the taken-for-granted: How research analysis might inform pedagogical practices and institutional policies related to doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 37(6), 683–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.537747
McAlpine, Lynn, & McKinnon, Margot (2013). Supervision–the most variable of variables: Student perspectives. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.746227
Melkers, Julia, & Kiopa, Agrita (2010). The social capital of global ties in science: The added value of international collaboration. Review of Policy Research, 27, 389–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00448.x
Meschitti, Viviana, & Carassa, Antonella (2014). Participation as a form of socialisation: How a research team can support PhD students in their academic path. In Jelena Branković, Manja Klemenčić, Predrag Lažetić, & Pavel Zgaga (Eds.), Global challenges, local responses in higher education (pp. 149–168). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-581-6_8
Miles, Matthew B., & Huberman, Michael A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Pappa, Sotiria, Elomaa, Mailis, & Perälä-Littunen, Satu. (2020). Sources of stress and scholarly identity: The case of international doctoral students of education in Finland. Higher Education, 80(1), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00473-6
Peltonen, Jouni, Vekkaila, Jenna, Rautio, Pauliina, Haverinen, Kaisa, & Pyhältö, Kirsi (2017). Doctoral students’ social support profiles and their relationship to burnout, drop-out intentions, and time to candidacy. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 157–173. https://doi.org/10.28945/3792
Pilbeam, Colin, Lloyd-Jones, Gaynor, & Denyer, David (2013). Leveraging value in doctoral student networks through social capital. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1472–1489. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.636800
Pyhältö, Kirsi, Castelló, Montserrat., McAlpine, Lynn, & Peltonen, Jouni (2018). The cross-country doctoral experience survey (C-DES). User’s manual. Manual version.
Pyhältö, Kirsi, & Keskinen, Jenni (2012). Doctoral students’ sense of relational agency in their scholarly communities. International Journal of Higher Education, 1(2), 136–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p136
Pyhältö, Kirsi, Peltonen, Jouni, Rautio, Pauliina, Haverinen, Kaisa, Laatikainen, Maija, & Vekkaila, Jenna (2016). Summary report on doctoral experience in the UniOGS graduate school at the University of Oulu. University of Oulu. http://urn.fi/urn:isbn:9789526210841
Pyhältö, Kirsi, Peltonen, Jouni, Castelló, Montserrat, & McAlpine, Lynn (2020). What sustains doctoral students’ interest? Comparison of Finnish, UK and Spanish doctoral students’ perceptions. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 50(5), 726-741. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1585229
Pyhältö, Kirsi, Tikkanen, Lotta, & Anttila, Henrika (2022). The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on PhD candidates’ study progress and study wellbeing. Higher Education Research and Development, 42(2), 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2063816
Rönkkönen, Sara, Tikkanen, Lotta, Virtanen, Viivi, & Pyhältö, Kirsi (2023). The impact of supervisor and research community support on PhD candidates’ research engagement. European Journal of Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2023.2229565
Stubb, Jenni, Pyhältö, Kirsi, & Lonka, Kirsti (2011). Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2010.515572
Stubb, Jenni, Pyhältö, Kirsi, & Lonka, Kirsti (2012). The experienced meaning of working with a PhD thesis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(4), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.599422
Tikkanen, Lotta, Pyhältö, Kirsi, Bujacz, Aleksandra., & Nieminen, Juha (2021). Study engagement and burnout of the PhD candidates in medicine: A person centered approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 727746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727746
Vabø, Agnete, Alvsvåg, Aina, Kyvik, Svein, & Reymert, Ingvild (2016). The establishment of formal research groups in higher education institutions. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2016(2–3). https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.33896
Van Rijnsoever, Frank J., Hessels, Laurens K., & Vandeberg, Rens L. (2008). A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy, 37(8), 1255–1266. https://doi.org/110.1016/j.respol.2008.04.020
Vekkaila, Jenna, Virtanen, Viivi, Taina, Juha, & Pyhältö, Kirsi (2018). The function of social support in engaging and disengaging experiences among post PhD researchers in STEM disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 43(8), 1439–1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1259307
Villanueva-Felez, Africa, Molas-Gallart, Jordi, & Escribá-Esteve, Alejandro (2013). Measuring personal networks and their relationship with scientific production. Minerva, 51, 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9239-5
White, Jessica, & Nonnamaker, John (2008). Belonging and mattering: How doctoral students experience community. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 45(3), 676–698. https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.1860
Wisker, Gina, Robinson, Gillian, & Shacham, Miri (2007). Postgraduate research success: Communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701486720
Yao, Christina W., & Vital, L M. (2016). “I don’t think I’m prepared”: Perceptions of U.S. higher education doctoral students on international research preparation. Journal for the Study of Postsecondary and Tertiary Education, 1, 197–214. https://doi.org/10.28945/3489