“Diamond wins: life turned trade secret” – alternate history to reflect on industrial property rights in biotechnology

Main Article Content

Filipe Marques
Lídia Fonseca
Marta V. Mendes
Maria S. Almeida

Abstract

As of September 2022, the White House officially embraced biotechnology to generate innovative solutions for health problems,
climate change, energy scarcity, and food insecurity. Genetically modified organisms (GMO) alone account for more than 160 000 biotechnological solutions for technical problems. All these solutions have been disclosed to the public as a requirement for obtaining patent rights, excluding third parties of commercial exploitation. In this paper, we resort to alternative outcomes of the landmark Diamond v. Chakrabarty case on the patentability of GMO to illustrate the societal value of patents in biotechnology. The point of divergence set by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of Diamond creates a parallel reality where trade secrets prevail in biotechnology, representing an opportunity to reflect on the instructiveness of patents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Articles (including Reviews) Special Section

References

Hershey AD, Chase M. Independent functions of viral protein and nucleic acid in growth

of bacteriophage. The Journal of General Physiology 1952; 36: 39.

Watson JD, Crick FHC. Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose

Nucleic Acid. Nature 1953; 171: 737–738.

Meselson M, Stahl FW. The replication of DNA in Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1958; 44: 671–682.

Crick FHC, Barnett L, Brenner S, et al. General Nature of the Genetic Code for Proteins. Nature 1961; 192: 1227–1232.

OECD. A Framework for Biotechnology Statistics, https://www.oecd.org/sti/emergingtech/

aframeworkforbiotechnologystatistics.htm (2005, accessed 19 April 2023).

Jackson DA, Symons RH, Berg P. Biochemical Method for Inserting New Genetic Information into DNA of Simian Virus 40: Circular SV40 DNA Molecules Containing Lambda Phage Genes and the Galactose Operon of Escherichia coli. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1972; 69: 2904–2909.

Berg P. Asilomar 1975: DNA modification secured. Nature 2008; 455: 290–291.

Berg P, Baltimore D, Brenner S, et al. Summary statement of the Asilomar conference on

recombinant DNA molecules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1975; 72: 1981–1984.

Cohen SN, Boyer HW. Process for producing biologically functional molecular chimeras.

US4237224A, https://patents.google.com/patent/US4237224A/en (1980, accessed 19 April 2023).

Patents, https://www.wipo.int/patents/en/index.html (accessed 2 April 2023).

Summary of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883), https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/paris/summary_paris.html (accessed 25 April 2023).

Summary of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) (1970), https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/registration/pct/summary_pct.html (accessed 19 April 2023).

Chakrabarty AM. Microorganisms having multiple compatible degradative energy generating plasmids and preparation thereof. US4259444A, 1981.

Davey N, Rader RR, Chakravarti D. Ananda Mohan ‘Al’ Chakrabarty 1938–2020. Nat Biotechnol 2021; 39: 18–19.

Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980). Justia Law, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/447/303/ (accessed 6 April 2023).

Kevles DJ. Ananda Chakrabarty Wins a Patent: Biotechnology, law, and Society, 1972-1980. Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 1994; 25: 111–135.

Greely HT. The two months in 1980 that shaped the future of biotech. STAT,

https://www.statnews.com/2020/10/17/twomonths-in-1980-shaped-the-future-of-biotech/(2020, accessed 25 April 2023).

Norman C. Judge Halts Gene-Splicing Experiment. Science 1984; 224: 962–963.

Hibberd KA, Anderson PC, Barker M. Tryptophan overproducer mutants of cereal crops.

US4581847A, 1986.

Allen SK, Chaiton J a, Downing SL. Inducing polyploidy in oysters. US4834024A, 1989.

Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks. Notice: Animals – Patentability. Official Gazette of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 1987, p. 24.

Leder P, Stewart TA. Transgenic non-human mammals. US4736866A, 1988.

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Quigg, 710 F. Supp. 728 (N.D. Cal. 1989), https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/zFSupp/710/728/1462603/ (accessed 9 July 2023).

Lumelsky A. Diamond v. Chakrabarty: Gauging Congress’s Response to Dynamic Statutory Interpretation by the Supreme Court. USFL Rev 2004; 39: 641.

Biotechnology Market Size & Growth Trends Report, 2030, https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/biotechnology-market (accessed 26 April 2023).

Devos Y, Maeseele P, Reheul D, et al. Ethics in the societal debate on genetically modified organisms: A (re) quest for sense and sensibility. Journal of agricultural and environmental ethics 2008; 21: 29–61.

Levidow L, Bijman J. Farm inputs under pressure from the European food industry.

Food Policy 2002; 27: 31–45.

Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions, http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1998/44/oj/eng

(1998, accessed 9 July 2023).

Trade secrets, https://www.wipo.int/tradesecrets/en/index.html (accessed 2 April 2023).

Trade secrets / regulatory data protection, https://www.uspto.gov/ip-policy/tradesecretpolicy (accessed 27 April 2023).

Cohen SN, Chang ACY, Boyer HW, et al. Construction of Biologically Functional

Bacterial Plasmids In Vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1973; 70: 3240–3244.

Official Gazette for Patents, https://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/

official-gazette/official-gazette-patents (accessed 3 May 2023).

Office EP. European Patent Bulletin, https://www.epo.org/searching-for-patents/legal/bulletin.html (accessed 3 May 2023).

Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IjJ, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 2016; 3: 160018.

Resources M. Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/

pac/mpep/mpep-9020-appx-r.html#d0e320131 (accessed 4 May 2023).

Watts K, Seshadri R, Richardson T. Photosynthetic microorganisms comprising

exogenous prokaryotic acyl-ACP thioesterases and methods for producing fatty acids. US8530207B2, https://patents.google.com/patent/US8530207B2/en (2013, accessed 4 May 2023).

WIPO’s Budapest Treaty facilitates biotech patenting, https://www.wipo.int/wipo_

magazine/en/2015/04/article_0001.html (accessed 27 April 2023).

Bradfisch GA, Michaels T, Payne JM. Biologically active Bacillus thuringiensis isolates.

US5208017A, https://patents.google.com/patent/US5208017A/en (1993, accessed 3 May 2023).

Tajima K, Kose R, Sakurai H. Bacterial cellulose and bacterium producing it. US9879295B2, https://patents.google.com/patent/US9879295B2/en (2018, accessed 4 May 2023).

Vargas-Parada L. GM maize splits Mexico. Nature 2014; 511: 16–17.

Feng PCC, Martin a S, Jintai H, et al. Transgenic Maize Event Mon 87427 and the Relative

Development Scale. MX358629B, 2018.

Price B, Cotter J. The GM Contamination Register: a review of recorded contamination incidents associated with genetically modified organisms (GMOs), 1997–2013. International Journal of Food Contamination 2014; 1: 5.

Weintraub L. To Life!: Eco Art in Pursuit of a Sustainable Planet. Univ of California Press, 2012; p. 147-152.

35 U.S. Code § 203 - March-in rights. LII / Legal Information Institute,

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/35/203 (accessed 4 May 2023).

Several march-in and royalty free rights cases, under the Bayh-Dole Act. Knowledge EcologyInternational, https://www.keionline.org/cl/march-in-royalty-free (accessed 7 April 2023).

Intergovernmental Negotiating Body. Zero draft of the WHO convention, agreement or

other international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2023/02/27/default-calendar/fourthmeeting-

of-the-intergovernmental-negotiatingbody-(inb)-for-a-who-instrument-on-pandemicprevention-

preparedness-and-response (2023, accessed 3 May 2023).

Feldman R. Patent and Antitrust: Differing Shades of Meaning, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1127564 (2008, accessed 8 April 2023).

Munoz BR (ed). Health. London : Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2020.

Maskus KE. Cognitive dissonance in the economics of patent protection, trade and development. Kritika: Essays on Intellectual Property 2017; 1–21.

Shiva V. Making Peace with the Earth, https://sydneypeacefoundation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/2010-SPP_Vandana-Shiva1.pdf (2010, accessed 4 February 2023).

Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Fifth Meeting of the

Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Decision V/5 on Agricultural Biological Diversity. Nairobi, Kenya: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=7147 (May 2000, accessed 9 July 2023).

Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Eight Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Decision VIII/23 on Agricultural Diversity. Curitiba, Brazil: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity,

https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=11037 (March 2006, accessed 9 July 2023).

WIPO Director General’s Keynote Address to the World Government Summit, https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/aboutwipo/en/dg_tang/docs/dg-keynote-worldgovernment-summit14022023.pdf (2023, accessed 4 February 2023).